IMO Local files>Youtube>Qobuz>Tidal>Others, but every service has its own pros and cons. It should be here tomorrow, So I should be able to put my listening impressions on here.ĮDIT: Here's some of the music that sound's really well mastered to me, an entire 20 hours of the stuff: When my new DAC arrives, I'll see if i can see a difference between MQA and FLAC.
QOBUZ VS AMAZON HD ANDROID
It's similar to roon, just let's you control Tidal from your phone, iOS or Android (use android) Tidal run's off my McIntosh MS500, which is a dedicated streamer.
QOBUZ VS AMAZON HD FREE
I noticed a difference going from free spotify to spotify premium, then a similar quality increase between spotify premium to Tidal HIFI, but I wouldn't bother with Tidal HIFI unless you have a system that "deserves" it, otherwise put the money into better audio gear. But my system is ludicrously expensive (just over 170,000 dollars) so it kind of deserves it in my mind. Personally I use Tidal HIFI (master's version/tier), it's 20 dollar's a month, which is typically 96khz/24 bit, but some album's are in 192khz/24bit. Roon supports local files, as well as Tidal/Qobuz integration and is absolutely stellar.Īny experienced audiophiles here can recommend the best apps for music streaming? Like FLAC audio format. Qobuz's is overall the best, but makes music sound warmer than it actually is. Unfortunately, all of them are pretty bad.Īmazon's doesn't even support exclusive mode output (WASAPI Exclusive or ASIO) Main thing that separates the services is their players. But seriously unless you have some very high end gear it won't be an audible improvement. Unless you REALLY want access to 96khz 24 bit stuff. Overall I'd say Tidal is probably the best due to the excellent library. And just straight FLAC, no need to bother with MQA or anything.
![qobuz vs amazon hd qobuz vs amazon hd](https://erklartwurdenochmal.com/qojkew/YQU8r4vJLzZYZ7QyM2qKjwHaFj.jpg)
Formats such as 24bit 96khz or sometimes higher. However it does have the most music available in high res FLAC. Qobuz has the smallest (though still a very good) selection. There's serious diminishing returns with higher quality flac than that) So I view it pretty much as just 16bit 44.1khz FLAC only. The only downside is that their super high quality stuff is served in "MQA" format, which is a rabbithole thats too long for this thread, but the TLDR is that its bad for all sorts of reasons and exists basically just to generate licensing fees.
![qobuz vs amazon hd qobuz vs amazon hd](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-KxRs6paJvns/VMMH03yW6UI/AAAAAAABJks/J0pnrCi40vY/s150/Queen-rock-montrea-4k-ultra-hd-l-cinepolis-mexico-2015.png)
Tidal also has an excellent selection, that has MASSIVELY improved over the last couple years. Therefore, no bit perfect output which for me rules it out as an option until that gets sorted.
QOBUZ VS AMAZON HD WINDOWS
Also, amazon music's client currently has no WASAPI or ASIO output support, meaning you are forced to use the windows mixer. There may be tracks in an album available in some higher sample rates than some of the others, its weird. But for library, Amazon has the most music, though it varies in quality. So from that perspective, none of them are any "better" than eachother. They're the same masters, and the FLAC itself is identical (I only know of a few tracks that differ depending on which service you use.). If you can afford it, get "Roon" and play tidal or qobuz through thatĪmazon, Tidal, and Qobuz all for the most part serve up the same FLAC as eachother.
![qobuz vs amazon hd qobuz vs amazon hd](https://twister6com.files.wordpress.com/2021/05/ak_se180-30.jpg)
Especially if you're a student as you get 50% off. TLDR: Tidal is probably the best overall. So i've done quite extensive testing with various streaming apps and playback services.